arrow icon
Times Union Center
CHAT BOARD   MAAC Team Forums - Canisius   Fairfield   Iona   Loyola   Manhattan   Marist   Niagara   Rider   St Peters  


News...
Times Union Center

Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Burdine updates Options · View
Voice
Posted: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 12:45:11 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/4/2008
Posts: 901
Points: 2,709
Location: Near the Gulf
Tarheel Mel wrote:
25 and around 12 against a high major size and athleticism front court is pretty impressive. There were a couple big time plays ont here.


The line above keeps coming back to me and it makes me think of how we often discuss Edwin's game visibility v. his stats. By that I mean this: while watching the game (in about a 4x4 window on my laptop) I could tell that Mel was having a good game and that the competition he was facing was pretty strong. I have admit though (here comes the Edwin comparision) that even though it was clear he can play and was having a good game, I never would have thought that he had 25 & 12. 14 & 8 - sure no problem. But, if there is such a thing ... that was about as quiet a 25 & 12 as someone can get just like Edwin sometimes does... Well a couple of the dunks weren't so quiet ;-) but at least I didn't realize he was having such a great game against high major competition.

Looking forward to seeing Mel in G&G for the next 4 years! Whistle
class94
Posted: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 2:28:21 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/5/2008
Posts: 942
Points: 2,444
Location: Scottsdale
Voice wrote:
Tarheel Mel wrote:
25 and around 12 against a high major size and athleticism front court is pretty impressive. There were a couple big time plays ont here.


The line above keeps coming back to me and it makes me think of how we often discuss Edwin's game visibility v. his stats. By that I mean this: while watching the game (in about a 4x4 window on my laptop) I could tell that Mel was having a good game and that the competition he was facing was pretty strong. I have admit though (here comes the Edwin comparision) that even though it was clear he can play and was having a good game, I never would have thought that he had 25 & 12. 14 & 8 - sure no problem. But, if there is such a thing ... that was about as quiet a 25 & 12 as someone can get just like Edwin sometimes does... Well a couple of the dunks weren't so quiet ;-) but at least I didn't realize he was having such a great game against high major competition.

Looking forward to seeing Mel in G&G for the next 4 years! Whistle


My sentiments EXACTLY! Especially the part where I could tell he was going up against a good front court, but I still don't know exactly how good.
Tarheel Mel
Posted: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 4:59:06 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/5/2009
Posts: 138
Points: 414
class94 wrote:
Voice wrote:
Tarheel Mel wrote:
25 and around 12 against a high major size and athleticism front court is pretty impressive. There were a couple big time plays ont here.


The line above keeps coming back to me and it makes me think of how we often discuss Edwin's game visibility v. his stats. By that I mean this: while watching the game (in about a 4x4 window on my laptop) I could tell that Mel was having a good game and that the competition he was facing was pretty strong. I have admit though (here comes the Edwin comparision) that even though it was clear he can play and was having a good game, I never would have thought that he had 25 & 12. 14 & 8 - sure no problem. But, if there is such a thing ... that was about as quiet a 25 & 12 as someone can get just like Edwin sometimes does... Well a couple of the dunks weren't so quiet ;-) but at least I didn't realize he was having such a great game against high major competition.

Looking forward to seeing Mel in G&G for the next 4 years! Whistle


My sentiments EXACTLY! Especially the part where I could tell he was going up against a good front court, but I still don't know exactly how good.


QEA frontcourt consists of #32 Juvonte Reddick, a 6'9" senior, mid major plus kid. Been getting good reviews from Telep and may have the big boys sniffing around because of his size, athletic ability and motor.

#35 Quincy Miller - 6'8" Top 10 player in the junior class. Not much more needs to be said.

#33 Dominque Pointer 6'7" junior. Very good athlete, not super skilled. Probably a low mid major kid.

#24 Aaron Bowen 6'5" Senior. Came off the bench and is committed to Marquette. Thin but can really shoot and is also a high level athlete.

So between the 2 teams we probably had 6 high major guys on the floor. Mel was the second leading scorer and rebounder.

I follow recruiting fairly closely so I knew a good deal about them before we played.

class94
Posted: Thursday, January 07, 2010 12:00:02 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/5/2008
Posts: 942
Points: 2,444
Location: Scottsdale
As always, thanks for the info and insight TM. Was Mel matched up against any one of those guys specifically?
Tarheel Mel
Posted: Friday, January 08, 2010 10:45:28 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/5/2009
Posts: 138
Points: 414
class94 wrote:
As always, thanks for the info and insight TM. Was Mel matched up against any one of those guys specifically?


Mostly Reddic but all guys rotated on all our inside guys.
Tarheel Mel
Posted: Friday, January 08, 2010 8:42:17 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/5/2009
Posts: 138
Points: 414
Mel had 24 and big rebound totals in a win over Worcester Academy tonight. Again for prespective Worcester has a very athletic 6'8" kid and a 6'11" low major kid. Will have details later.
SaintsFan
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 10:21:35 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member , moderators

Joined: 11/4/2008
Posts: 2,171
Points: 4,898
Location: Schenectady, NY
Looks like Burdine had 19 pts in a 70-53 win
BigSaint G
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 11:22:45 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/5/2008
Posts: 308
Points: 598
Mel,

What did you think of the Ackerman kid at Worcester? He is the 6-11 kid.

BSG
Tarheel Mel
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 12:51:24 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/5/2009
Posts: 138
Points: 414
BigSaint G wrote:
Mel,

What did you think of the Ackerman kid at Worcester? He is the 6-11 kid.

BSG


I am guessing you mean in terms of Siena. As of right now don't think he is good enough. I actually wasn't at the game but have seen him probably 10 times. Our inside guys got him in foul trouble. Obviously he didn't do much to prevent Mel from scoring or rebounding, nor our other bigs.

However definitely need to keep a eye on him. He is legit 6'11" and a very hard worker. Runs ok and has good hands. Has really improved over the last 12 months. At this point I would say he is a low major, BU, Holy Cross, UNH, should all be recruiting him hard. Could he get to Siena's level, absolutely but he needs to show that. Hard to get his size at the mid major level.

We play another 6'11" kid today who Siena should be monitoring.
class94
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 3:49:14 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/5/2008
Posts: 942
Points: 2,444
Location: Scottsdale
Keep it up Basabe. Franklin's will be ENORMOUS shoes to fill. He's really playing like a POY candidate.

Hey TM, several weeks back you posted about Basabe going up against Majok Majok. Mr. Majok is now listed on "recruit recon" as having interest by Siena. What can you tell us about him?
gorvy
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 4:00:06 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/4/2008
Posts: 2,362
Points: 6,895
Location: Albany NY
Is his name really Majok Majok? I don't think I can handle a guy with two same names.
class94
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 4:03:59 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/5/2008
Posts: 942
Points: 2,444
Location: Scottsdale
gorvy wrote:
Is his name really Majok Majok? I don't think I can handle a guy with two same names.


Don't worry Gorv, they're pronounced differently.
gorvy
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 4:10:48 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/4/2008
Posts: 2,362
Points: 6,895
Location: Albany NY
You have got to be kidding me.
class94
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 4:11:45 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/5/2008
Posts: 942
Points: 2,444
Location: Scottsdale
gorvy wrote:
You have got to be kidding me.


Actually, I AM kidding you. I have no clue.
gorvy
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 4:26:41 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/4/2008
Posts: 2,362
Points: 6,895
Location: Albany NY
I don't care how good he is, we have to get this kid.
saintKK
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 4:29:39 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/7/2008
Posts: 456
Points: 986
Location: Massachusetts
Besides the fun of having two same names, we don't need anymore front court guys in this class. That would be overkill. I think, we do need a guard though.
Tarheel Mel
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 6:36:04 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/5/2009
Posts: 138
Points: 414
From Phil at Hoopville:

In prep school action, St. Mark’s knocked off Worcester Academy 67-55 on Friday in a rematch of a game Worcester won a year ago. The Lions responded to every rally by the Hilltoppers and look to be playing better basketball, although it’s worth noting that they have played a very tough schedule to date. Siena signee Melsahn Basabe (6′7″ Sr. SF-PF, Glen Cove (NY)) continues to have a solid senior season, scoring a game-high 24 points to lead the Lions, while Alex Murphy (6′9″ So. SF, Wakefield (RI)) had 15. Christophe Varidel (6′1″ Sr. SG, Geneva (Switzerland)) led Worcester Academy with 16 points and showcased his excellent shooting stroke.
gorvy
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 6:37:39 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/4/2008
Posts: 2,362
Points: 6,895
Location: Albany NY
Awesome, I guess the day Can get better!
gorvy
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 6:38:22 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/4/2008
Posts: 2,362
Points: 6,895
Location: Albany NY
saintKK wrote:
Besides the fun of having two same names, we don't need anymore front court guys in this class. That would be overkill. I think, we do need a guard though.


No problem! One Majok can play forward, and the other Majok can play guard.
BigSaint G
Posted: Saturday, January 09, 2010 7:32:55 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/5/2008
Posts: 308
Points: 598
Mel.

How did Clifford look today - I know Siena is looking at him

GSP
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

FlatEarth Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.479 seconds.